A protester chants in Cairo’s Tahrir Square: Egyptians are back on the streets, and they vow to stay there until the ruling military council enacts democratic reforms. How did the country’s revolution go from success to stalemate in just  four months? Photo: REUTERS/Asmaa Waguih

A protester chants in Cairo’s Tahrir Square: Egyptians are back on the streets, and they vow to stay there until the ruling military council enacts democratic reforms. How did the country’s revolution go from success to stalemate in just four months? Photo: REUTERS/Asmaa Waguih

In a much-hyped speech, President Obama said the U.S. would help Tunisia and Egypt enact democratic reforms by offering both countries new aid and investment. He also endorsed, more clearly than ever, the idea of establishing a Palestinian state along pre-1967 borders as a way to settle the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As well, Obama denounced regimes in Libya, Syria, and Iran for using violence to silence demonstrators demanding greater freedom. Did the president spell out a brave new vision for U.S. policy in the Middle East, or merely make a lot of empty promises?

Here’s what the political responders are saying

The newest issue, which hit shelves and doorsteps on Friday.
We begin this week by talking about oil prices. The impacts of the Arab uprisings are echoing far beyond the Middle East and North Africa — at the gas pump and in heating bills, for starters. Will the fragile economic recovering survive the revolts? Here’s what the talk show hosts had to say about it this weekend.

The newest issue, which hit shelves and doorsteps on Friday.

We begin this week by talking about oil prices. The impacts of the Arab uprisings are echoing far beyond the Middle East and North Africa — at the gas pump and in heating bills, for starters. Will the fragile economic recovering survive the revolts? Here’s what the talk show hosts had to say about it this weekend.

The sexual assault of Lara Logan: What’s the fallout for female journalists?
In the aftermath of the disturbing attack on the CBS correspondent in Egypt, media organizations face tough questions about the safety of female reporters. What does the attack augur for female reporters in the field?
The media will protect its reporters better: We can  only hope this awful news will lead to a “broader push by the Fourth  Estate to protect correspondents against assault,” says  Mac McClelland at Mother Jones. Already, the Committee to  Protect Journalists has said it will add a section on sexual assault to  its safety handbook. “It’s about damn time,” too. Already, “too many  journalists have suffered similar horrors.”
And we’ll be more open about the dangers they face: Many female reporters face sexual harassment and worse in their line of  work, says  Laila Lalami at The Nation. But they “rarely report it for  fear of losing assignments.” For Logan to come forward about her  assault breaks this “powerful taboo” once and for all. 
More here

The sexual assault of Lara Logan: What’s the fallout for female journalists?

In the aftermath of the disturbing attack on the CBS correspondent in Egypt, media organizations face tough questions about the safety of female reporters. What does the attack augur for female reporters in the field?

  • The media will protect its reporters better: We can only hope this awful news will lead to a “broader push by the Fourth Estate to protect correspondents against assault,” says Mac McClelland at Mother Jones. Already, the Committee to Protect Journalists has said it will add a section on sexual assault to its safety handbook. “It’s about damn time,” too. Already, “too many journalists have suffered similar horrors.”
  • And we’ll be more open about the dangers they face: Many female reporters face sexual harassment and worse in their line of work, says Laila Lalami at The Nation. But they “rarely report it for fear of losing assignments.” For Logan to come forward about her assault breaks this “powerful taboo” once and for all.

More here

Did Anderson Cooper take sides on Egypt? 
Anderson Cooper is under attack again — not  from Egyptian thugs, but from his colleagues in the American media.  Some are angry  at the CNN anchor for repeatedly telling viewers that the Egyptian  administration was telling “lies” in the run-up to the resignation of  President Hosni Mubarak last week. The government, he said, is “lying to  Egyptians and lying to the world.” In response to accusations from  viewers that he had lost objectivity after being attacked  on the streets of Cairo, Cooper responded: “This is about the  truth.” Meanwhile, media critics have taken up the charge that Cooper “took  sides” on Egypt. Some thoughts from commentators:
Exposing lies is what journalists do: It’s a  journalists’ job to “treat factually false statements as false,” says  Glenn Greenwald at Salon. Cooper was simply doing his job —  identifying the lies of this corrupt regime, and describing them to his  viewers. Allowing Mubarak to lie freely and without recourse would have  been a far more egregious example of “taking sides.” Instead, Cooper  stood up for the truth.
If only journalists told us when the U.S. government is lying: Wouldn’t it be great, says  Andrew Sullivan at The Atlantic, if “journalists actually  used the world ‘lie’ to describe when the U.S. government lies.” Not  when it spins the truth — but when it “says something it knows is untrue  and we can independently verify is untrue.” It’s time the media tell it  like it is, no matter who is lying.
More opinion here.

Did Anderson Cooper take sides on Egypt?

Anderson Cooper is under attack again — not from Egyptian thugs, but from his colleagues in the American media. Some are angry at the CNN anchor for repeatedly telling viewers that the Egyptian administration was telling “lies” in the run-up to the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak last week. The government, he said, is “lying to Egyptians and lying to the world.” In response to accusations from viewers that he had lost objectivity after being attacked on the streets of Cairo, Cooper responded: “This is about the truth.” Meanwhile, media critics have taken up the charge that Cooper “took sides” on Egypt. Some thoughts from commentators:

  • Exposing lies is what journalists do: It’s a journalists’ job to “treat factually false statements as false,” says Glenn Greenwald at Salon. Cooper was simply doing his job — identifying the lies of this corrupt regime, and describing them to his viewers. Allowing Mubarak to lie freely and without recourse would have been a far more egregious example of “taking sides.” Instead, Cooper stood up for the truth.
  • If only journalists told us when the U.S. government is lying: Wouldn’t it be great, says Andrew Sullivan at The Atlantic, if “journalists actually used the world ‘lie’ to describe when the U.S. government lies.” Not when it spins the truth — but when it “says something it knows is untrue and we can independently verify is untrue.” It’s time the media tell it like it is, no matter who is lying.

More opinion here.

The wave of popular uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East has already swept Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak and Tunisia’s Zine el Abidine Ben Ali from power. Now, everyone from Western leaders to Arab protesters to nervous autocrats across the Muslim world are wondering: Who’s next? Some possibilities:

  • BAHRAIN: King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa
    Protesters held an Egypt-style “day of rage” on Monday, and the “deep grievances” of the country’s poorer Shia Muslim minority make Bahrain “the most susceptible” of the Gulf states to popular revolt, says regional analyst Theodore Karasik, as quoted by Bloomberg Businessweek. King Hamad, part of the Sunni elite, tried to “bribe” each family in the country with thousands of dollars, but that may not be enough to pacify the protesters, says Ditz in Antiwar.com. Bahrain is “the biggest wild-card” in the region.
  • IRAN: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
    Mubarak’s fall has reinvigorated the passions that fueled the 2009 “Green Revolution,” which went largely underground after harsh government crackdowns. Thousands defied government warnings Monday and took to the streets in Tehran and other big cities, ostensibly in solidarity with Egyptians, but also shouting “death to the dictator.” The chance a full-scale uprising is “moderate,” says Mahanta in Mother Jones, but the odds of another crackdown are “tragically high.”
  • PALESTINE: President Mahmoud Abbas
    The day after Mubarak fell, Abbas and the ruling Fatah party scheduled long-overdue national elections for September, and on Monday the entire cabinet resigned. This shows that Abbas is “freaking out,” says Khaled Abu Toameh in The Jersusalm Post. “In the eyes of many Palestinians, Abbas is not much different from Hosni Mubarak,” and these acts of “desperation” are an attempt to keep Egypt’s “anti-government wave” from washing him out of power.

Also, Algeria and Yemen. Read more here.

For weeks, the world watched with rapt attention as the uprising in Egypt challenged and finally toppled the government of President Hosni Mubarak. As the main narrative unfolded, however, several curious and less widely documented stories were unfolding in and around Cairo’s Tahrir Square. Here, some of the stranger aspects of the revolts:

  • Two demonstrators say “I do”
    A young couple — Ahmed Zaafan, 29, and Ola Abdel Hamid, 22 — tied the knot on February 6, surrounded by tanks and thousands of their fellow demonstrators in Tahrir Square. The newlyweds said their choice of location signalled their determination to stay in the square until Mubarak caved. “These protesters are family now,” said Zaafan. “Ola and I wanted to share our happiness with everyone.”
  • Humor wasn’t sidelined
    Many of the demonstrators tempered their anger with levity, carrying signs with messages like “De-Nile Not Only a River in Egypt.” One protester sporting a “big afro” held a sign saying, “Mubarak, leave so I can go home and cut my hair.” On Twitter, “Mubaraked” became a verb, as in, “I invited a friend round for dinner last night, but they didn’t leave till 12 despite my yawns. They really Mubaraked.’”
  • A KFC conspiracy?
    State television incorrectly reported that anti-Mubarak protesters were being paid $100 — and getting fed Kentucky Fried Chicken (a “Kentucky meal,” as it’s widely known in Egypt, can cost the typical worker a day’s wages). The bogus rumors sparked suspicions that the uprising was being driven by Western interlopers. “I came to get the [Kentucky Fried Chicken] or the $100 but I can’t find it,” joked protester Khaled Badawy, as quoted in Turkish newspaper Hürriyet.

Read the entire list here

Another shout out from David Gregory on Meet The Press? We’re flattered!

If you’re interested in seeing more of our Egypt coverage, here’s our most recent story:

Post-Mubarak Egypt: Winners and losers

"If the Egyptian people can create a democracy in the heart of the Arab world, it will be a more significant contribution to civilization than the great pyramids."

Sen. Lindsey Graham,  R - South Carolina

Well, that’s one way to put it. Here’s a roundup of what the press and politicians are saying about Mubarak’s departure and the next step for Egypt

This week’s In-Depth Briefing gives a detailed look inside Egypt’s biggest opposition group, and the world’s largest and most influential Islamist movement: The Muslim Brotherhood.

While many of its older members are deeply conservative, many of the younger ones are modern and reform-minded. Khaled Hamza, a voice of moderation within the group and the editor of the group’s official website, says the Brotherhood would never support a rule by the clergy, as in Iran. We do not believe Islam requires a theocracy,’’ he says. “Democracy is the only way.’’

Continue reading for more, including why the group was banned, whether or not it’s violent, and its potential rule in Egypt.