1. On Thursday, a three-judge panel for the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) — which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman —  is unconstitutional. This marks the first time that a federal appeals court has struck down the law, making it likely that the constitutionality of DOMA will eventually be weighed by the Supreme Court.

    Here, five takeaways from the landmark decision:

    1. The court didn’t declare gay marriage a constitutional right
    The court focused on a provision in DOMA that denies federal benefits — such as the ability to file taxes jointly or receive Social Security survivor benefits — to married same-sex couples. The court said that part of the law is unconstitutional because it interferes with the right of states to craft their own marriage laws by discriminating against same-sex couples in states where gay marriage is legal. The court stopped short of ruling that gay couples have a constitutional right to marry, nor did it force all states to recognize the legality of same-sex marriages performed in states where it is legal.

    2. Two GOP-appointed judges joined the ruling 
    The three-judge panel, which included two Republican-appointed judges, was unanimous in its decision, strengthening the nonpartisan case against DOMA. Judge Michael Boudin was appointed by George H.W. Bush, while Judge Juan Torruella was appointed by Ronald Reagan. The third judge, Sandra Lynch, was appointed by Bill Clinton, who signed DOMA into law in 1996.

    3. The Obama administration did not defend the law 
    While it’s customary for the Justice Department to defend challenges to all federal laws, the Obama administration announced last year that it would not defend DOMA in court, deeming it unconstitutional. Obama only recently became the first sitting president to endorse gay marriage, though he says the definition of marriage should be left to the states. 

    4. DOMA opponents are claiming a huge victory 
    "Today’s landmark ruling makes clear once again that DOMA is a discriminatory law for which there is no justification," says Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley. “It is unconstitutional for the federal government to create a system of first- and second-class marriages.” 

    5. But the ruling will not go into effect… yet 
    The Boston court said its ruling would have no effect on DOMA in practice, affirming that “only the Supreme Court can finally decide this unique case.” The latest ruling followed a similar decision by a district judge in California last week, “a further chipping away at the law that is almost certain to see it land before the Supreme Court within the next year or so,” says Chris McGreal at Britain’s The Guardian.

    (Source: theweek.com)

     
  1. andrijea reblogged this from ihateteganandsara
  2. xreadyaimriotx reblogged this from loudmouthradio
  3. humorandnews likes this
  4. nourishyourturtleheart reblogged this from whenindoubtapplymoreglitter
  5. catron likes this
  6. gangofone likes this
  7. coleyboley likes this
  8. gottalivethislife likes this
  9. happyseabear likes this
  10. anunreliablesource likes this
  11. shananigan00 reblogged this from fozzykate
  12. fozzykate reblogged this from ihateteganandsara
  13. fake-facade reblogged this from trioflife
  14. smilefortyeight reblogged this from questionall
  15. thatferrybroad reblogged this from lifecrystals
  16. smilefortyeight likes this
  17. razalian reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  18. houseoforange likes this
  19. selinaschweitzer likes this
  20. trioflife reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  21. whatifitactuallyworks likes this
  22. blamedecade likes this
  23. thestoutorialist likes this
  24. breakingtendency reblogged this from ihateteganandsara
  25. awkwardmusing likes this
  26. bandaid911 likes this
  27. ihateteganandsara reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  28. arielsara likes this
  29. cordeliareagan reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  30. cordeliareagan likes this
  31. misunderstoodmom likes this
  32. madamedevideoland likes this
  33. suicidehurts likes this
  34. fluffhoof likes this
  35. syncrasis likes this
  36. rubylis reblogged this from whenindoubtapplymoreglitter
  37. rubylis likes this
  38. maelavee reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  39. dancingdogsandbears reblogged this from whenindoubtapplymoreglitter
  40. whenindoubtapplymoreglitter reblogged this from jessicathemess
  41. tolivebythesea reblogged this from clementinesandtulips
  42. jessicathemess reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  43. lifecrystals reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  44. lifecrystals likes this
  45. singulus likes this
  46. questionall reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  47. questionall likes this
  48. bythethroatt likes this
  49. godlessheathenhippie reblogged this from theweekmagazine
  50. loudmouthradio reblogged this from theweekmagazine and added:
    Just so you know …